The manuscript is finally completed and hereby transmitted to members of the Space Science & Technology Committee of the US House of Representatives for their consideration and action.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Creator_Destroyer_Sustainer_of_Life.pdf
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Creator_Destroyer_Sustainer_of_Life.doc
The conclusion is just this: Two seemingly minor falsehoods, promoted as scientific facts to save the world from possible nuclear annihilation in 1945:
- Neutrons attract neutrons
- H-fusion powers the Sun
Destroyed the integrity of science, education, research journals, the news media, and world leaders – and Creator-endowed rights to self-governance, as a virus living only in nerve cells might totally incapacitate an entire organism without leaving any visible outward sign of its presence.
A copy of this manuscript is being sent to others interested in this topic, and to the editor and publisher of Nature.
Contact me if you are unable to open the links and pdf or doc files will be sent directly to you.
My research mentor, the late Paul Kazuo Kuroda, directed me to start research in 1960 that would finally reveal this information. Four others provided helpful information about events and emotions that elevated scientific models above scientific observations in the tragic ending of the Second World War: Fred Hoyle, David Snell, Robert Jungk and George Orwell.
I regret that it took so long to complete that 1960 assignment.
Who Cares If Neutrons Repel and Stars Make Hydrogen?
.
A nuclear “holocaust” was avoided, nationalism and racism were reduced as the result of official deception in 1945-46. So, who cares if :
- Neutrons repel, rather than attract, other neutrons
- Stars make and discard rather than burn Hydrogen
- A pulsar is the Creator, Destroyer & Sustainer of Life ?
These consequences of the 1945-46 falsehoods provide the answer:
- Education was “dumbed down” to hide deception.
- Egos of world leaders have been dangerously inflated.
- Many seriously believe they can control humans and Nature.
- They are dangerously unaware the Creator, Destroyer and Sustainer of Life now lurks beneath the Sun’s placid photosphere.
- Technology depends on the reliability of mathematics and the physical sciences, but the foundation of physical sciences was destroyed by promoting falsehoods on the energy (E) stored as mass (m) in cores of atoms, planets, stars and galaxies, including the foundation of astronomy, astrophysics, climatology, cosmology, nuclear, particle, planetary, solar, space, and theoretical physics, for example.
The whole world is in a “mell of a hess” – precisely because world leaders and leaders of the scientific community used deception to try to save the world – a noble goal. Members of the Space Science & Technology Committee can either correct the situation now, or wait for the next major EMP (electro-magnetic pulse) [1] or cosmic eruption [2] from the Sun to do the job.
– Oliver K. Manuel (18 July 2013 Addendum)
[1] Stuart Clark, The Sun Kings: The unexpected tragedy of Richard Carrington and the tale of how modern astronomy began (Princeton University Press, 2007) 224 pp: http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/0691141266 http://www.bookslut.com/nonfiction/2007_07_011472.php
[2] I. G. Usoskin, B. Kromer, F. Ludlow, J. Beer, M. Friedrich, G. A. Kovaltsov, S. K. Solanki and L. Wacker, “The AD775 cosmic event revisited: The Sun is to blame,” Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters 552, L3 (2013): http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321080
Who Cares If I Tell
A Little White Lie?
The Creator,
Destroyer &
Sustainer of
LIFE
– – – – – – – –
http://hca.gilead.org.il/emperor.html
You can begin by asking who reviewed the budgets, approved and allocated public research funds for these mostly, if not entirely, false assertions:
- The SSM model of the Sun and the AGW model of Earth’s climate?
- The String Theory that holds modern physics together?
- With a universe of quarks, gluons, God Particles?
- That began with an imaginary Big Bang?
- And ends in imaginary Black Holes?
- Stars composed of Hydrogen?
- Oscillating solar neutrinos?
- Meteorites filled with:
- Fission products from super-heavy elements?
- Ne-A, Ne-B, Ne-C, Ne-D, Ne-E, etc.?
- Interstellar dust grains?
Nobody is competent to review all these stories, but I can confidently assure you they are mostly, if not entirely, false. Who violated the basic principles of science and converted government science into a tool of government propaganda so governments could extract more funds from the public to create more misleading propaganda? Who?
The US National Academy of Sciences, an independent and self-perpetuating organization that reviews budgets of federal research agencies for Congress. The US NAS was assisted by the UK’s Royal Society, the UN’s IPCC, the Swedish and the Norwegian Nobel Prize Committees and the publishers and editors of mainstream research journals like Nature, Science, Proceedings of the US National Academy of Science, Proceedings of the Royal Society, etc.
I wish you well in this challenging, but necessary task: Government by the people depends on public access to reliable.information. The integrity of our government thus depends on the integrity of government science.
The following books and manuscripts [1-5] may assist you with factual information to initiate the review. I will be happy to provide names and addresses of reliable scientists that can also help.
With deep regrets,
– Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
References:
1. Stuart Clark, The Sun Kings: The unexpected tragedy of Richard Carrington and the tale of how modern astronomy began (Princeton University Press, 2007) 224 pages http://www.bookslut.com/nonfiction/2007_07_011472.php http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/0691141266
2. Ian Plimer, Heaven and Earth: Global Warming, the Missing Science (Conner Court Publishing Pty, Ltd., 2009) 504 pages http://www.amazon.com/Heaven-Earth-Warming-Missing-Science/dp/1589794729
3. Oliver K. Manuel, “Neutron repulsion,” The Apeiron Journal 19, 123-150 (2012): http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V19NO2pdf/V19N2MAN.pdf
4. Jim Baaggott, Farewell to Reality: How Modern Physics Has Betrayed the Search for Scientific Truth (to be published, 1 August 2013) http://www.amazon.com/Farewell-Reality-Physics-Betrayed-Scientific/dp/1605984728/ref=sr_1_1/189-0402160-9589613?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1373250935&sr=1-1
5. Hilton Ratcliff, Stephen Hawking Smoked My Socks (copyright by Hilton Ratcliff, available from Muse Harbor Publishing, spring of 2014)
On this, the 237th birthday of this once great nation (2013 – 1776 = 237 yr), it is my patriotic duty to inform you of this sad fact:For the past sixty-eight years (2013 – 1945 = 68 yrs) the scientific community has lied to Congress about the energy (E) stored as mass (m) in cores of atoms, planets, stars and galaxies. Why? Fear and a deep sense of guilt and remorse for having released that energy to vaporize Hiroshima and Nagasaki and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians on August 6 and 9, 1945. Einstein explained in 1905 how energy (E) is stored as mass (m) and can be released as E = mc^2 from atomic mass data the Brookhaven National Lab tabulates for every known atom (under the conditions here on Earth):
.
b.) Paul K. Kuroda recognized the beginning of the world “while standing in the ruins of Hiroshima” in August 1945 and described it in the last paragraph on p. 2 of The Origin of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo Phenomenon (Springer Publishing, 165 pages, 1982) http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Chemical-Elements-Oklo-Phenomenon/dp/3540116796
c.) Sir Fred Hoyle acknowledged that his 1946 model of hydrogen-filled stars heated by H-fusion was unanimously adopted without debate or discussion on pp. 153-154 of his autobiography, Home Is Where the Wind Blows (University Science Books, 441 pages, appropriately published on April 1, 1994): http://www.amazon.com/Home-Where-Wind-Blows-Cosmologists/dp/093570227X
d.) News Reporter David Snell reported how near Allied forces came to losing WWII in “Japan developed atomic bomb; Russians grabbed scientists,” The Atlanta Constitution (Headlines, 3 Oct 1946) http://www.my-jia.com/The_Flight_of_the_Hog_Wild/Atlanta_Constitution_David_Snell_atomic_bomb_Korea.htm
e.) Robert Jungk describes the emotional strain on scientists for using nuclear energy to in 1945 kill hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in Brighter than a Thousand Suns: A personal history of the Atomic Scientists (translated by James Cleugh), Mariner Books; 5th Printing edition (October 21, 1970) 384 pages. Originally published in 1956 by Alfred Scherz Verlag as Heller als Tausend Sonnen (German): http://www.amazon.com/Brighter-than-Thousand-SunsScientists/dp/0156141507
f.) George Orwell (Eric Blair) started writing his warning to the public in 1946 about a new tyrannical government in “1984″, Signet Classic (July 1, 1950) 328 pages
http://www.amazon.com/1984-Signet-Classics-George-Orwell/dp/0451524934
2. Unyielding Experimental Evidence
a.) In 1960, Drs. John H. Reynolds (UC Berkeley, Physics) and Paul K. Kuroda (Univ Arkansas, Nuclear Chemistry) published the first Unyielding Experimental Evidence our elements were produced in a violent stellar explosion just before solids started to form in the Solar System (Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 8-10; Nature 187, 36-38). These are my graduate and post-graduate research advisors.
b.) Former UMR Chancellor, Dr. Raymond L. Bisplinghoff, a member of the National Science Board and the National Academy of Engineers in 1976 encouraged the editor of Science magazine to publish a debate between scientists from UMR and the University of Chicago: “Strange xenon, extinct superheavy elements and the solar neutrino puzzle”, Science 195, 208-210 (1977). Table 1 of that debate includes unyielding experimental evidence of local synthesis of elements in the Sun.
b.) Dr. Carl Sagan, Professor of Astronomy at Cornell and editor of Icarus, published data from the analysis of isotopes and elements in diverse meteorites [“The enigma of helium and anomalous xenon”, Icarus 41, 312-315 (1980)] with more unyielding experimental evidence that all primordial helium was associated with “strange” xenon at the birth of the Solar System.
c.) Nobel Laureate, Dr. Glenn T. Seaborg, former Chancellor, University of California – Berkeley and Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, helped the author organize the 1999 ACS Symposium on the Origin of Elements in the Solar System. Proceedings of that symposium contain many other pieces of unyielding experimental evidence that the Solar System formed directly from chemically and isotopically heterogeneous debris of a local supernova.
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1960Data.htm
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1972Data1.htm
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1972Data.htm
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1975Data.htm
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1976Data.htm
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1983Data.htm
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1991Data.htm
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1993Data.htm
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1994Data.htm
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1996Data.htm
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1998Data.htm
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/2000Data.htm
http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Elements-Solar-System-Implications/dp/0306465620
d.) Former UMR Chancellor, Dr. Gary Thomas, encouraged the author to attend the 2002 SOHO/GONG Conference on Helioseismology to answer criticism by NASA’s Dr. David Hathaway of evidence iron (Fe) is the most abundant element in the interior of the Sun. Proceedings of the 2002 SOHO/GONG Conference include additional unyielding experimental evidence of the Sun’s iron-rich interior.
Who Defies Neutron Repulsion, the Driver of the Solar Chariot?
When every leaf and blade of grass on Earth point toward a giant “fountain of energy” Copernicus discovered in 1543; Galileo defended at his trail in 1633 as a Divine order that persistent observers could decipher; Einstein explained with E = mc^2 in 1905; Solar oscillations validated in 1977 [1]; and the most precise nuclear and space-age measurements from 1960 to 2012 and observations like these [2-4] confirmed: Enormous solar flares rising from rigid, iron-rich structures below the fluid solar photosphere, http://tinyurl.com/dynchr4; Planetary disks that formed orbiting pulsar http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1029/ cores of embryonic new stars; and magnetic portals http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xj8vaLhR0s0&feature=relmfu that randomly divert and/or focus bursts of solar energy onto the Earth – I.e., These are just a few of the empirical facts Al Gore and the UN ignored in promoting AGW as settled science: The Creator, Destroyer, Preserver of lives is the force [5,6] that vaporized Hiroshima !
The Creator, Destroyer & Sustainer of atoms, worlds and lives in the solar system is a continuous chain of cause and effect triggered by neutron repulsion and emission from the Sun’s pulsar core- still making and controlling every atom in the solar system as astronaut, Dr. Edgar Mitchell (http://www.quantrek.org/new_perspective_cont.htm) and neurologist, Dr. Eben Alexander (http://www.eternea.org/index.aspx) suspected. World leaders collectively attempted to hide the Destroyer of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and inadvertently ended up losing their ability to promote the general welfare of society http://tgrule.com/2013/04/08/hunger-campaigns-to-kill-the-poor/#comment-10866
Who defies reality? Those caught in the internet of distractions from reality: Those social networking without time for private meditation, experimentation, contemplation; Followers of consensus models of reality, regardless of experimental measurements and observations of reality; Pursuing the illusion of knowledge without personal effort.
AGW dogma is the latest action to implement a 1945 decision to save the world from nuclear annihilation by forming a tyrannical one-world government and denying the force that made our elements, birthed the world, sustained the beginning and the evolution of life, endowed mankind with inalienable rights [compromised by the United Nations for sixty-four years until divine coincidence (karma) released those Climategate emails in 2009: http://tinyurl.com/9octn9b], and now extends >100 AU beyond Earth ! http://www.nature.com/news/voyager-s-long-goodbye-1.11348
As our social and economic systems now crumble, we must individually speak: 1. The truth as revealed by unbiased experimental observations, or . . . . we can join the crowd promoting: 2. Nobel-prize winning consensus science fabricated by cherry-picking data. Regardless of our decision, the human spirit will survive: Truth will be victorious !
Climategate History: World Leaders Chose Illusion of Control over Reality in 1945 ! George Orwell described the rise of Communism under Stalin before WWII in Animal Farm. The process continued under the UN after WWII, as predicted in a 1948 novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four and explained in a UN’s Report on Sustainability and Agenda 21. Peter Toth [1] told the truth & vanished [“Is the Sun a pulsar?” Nature 270, 159 (1977)] Those who had ruled a godless regime, pre-WWII, now control post-WWII science. Curt Suplee et al. [3] show observations [“The Sun -Living with a stormy star,” National Geographic Magazine feature story (July 2004)] that fit empirical facts [4] about “The Sun’s origin, composition and source of energy ” [LPSC XXIX, 1041 (March 2001)].
Earth’s stormy heat source (above) is 333,000 more massive than our home, the Earth. More than ten billion, billion (>10,000,000,000,000,000,000) Earths would fit inside the volume of interstellar space cleaned out five billion years (5 Gyr) ago by the Sun’s supernova explosion in birthing the Solar System. [Nature 489, 20-21 (2012)]
Deception Tainted 24 Oct 1945 Decision to Unite Nations on Water-Covered Planet
The 1543 scientific revolution gave rise to respect for the basic rights of citizens and their right to impose constitutional limits on government but the “nuclear fires” that consumed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Aug 1945 frightened world leaders into 1.) Abandoning nationalism and racism as techniques to control people; 2.) Re-establishing tyrannical control through the United Nations in Oct of 1945; and 3.) Then promoting false models of nuclear (7) and stellar cores (8-10) in 1946 ! As post-WWII science focused on false models of reality, instead of unbiased observations of reality, government science changed from the path of enlightenment into an instrument of enslavement, as Orwell predicted in 1948 would happen in “1984″, probably after a warning by Sir Fred Hoyle in 1947: http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984/
Like cores of the atoms that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the core of the Sun is composed of neutrons [6]. The Sun’s “sphere of influence” extends on out about eighteen billion kilometers (~18 x 10^9 km, 18 G km), encompassing all of the planets that the Sun birthed five billion years (~5 x 10^9 yrs, 5 Gyr) ago [2], just as the nucleus of each atom dominates a “sphere of influence” that encompasses all of the electrons orbiting it. The 1945 decision to unite nations and promote misinformation on the cores of atoms [7] and stars [8-10] led to Climategate in 2009. Official responses to fraudulent global temperature data revealed major events on the road to Climategate and also confirmed the ancient wisdom from various philosophies, religions, and cultures on the fine art of living:
1543: Copernicus discovers “fountain of energy” – Sol at core of the Solar System 1633: At inquisition, Galileo says “fountain of energy” is part of the Divine order 1776: US Declaration of Independence acknowledges the Divine rights of US citizens 1791: 10 Amendments to the US Constitution protect the Divine rights of US citizens 1905: Einstein shows m => E powers the Sun because mass (m) is stored energy (E) 1915: Niels Bohr finds electrons orbit massive core of atoms as planets orbit the Sun 1945: Energy (E) from cores of U and Pu destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945: Aug 12 Japan releases energy (E) from cores of U as USSR troops approach 1945: Frightened scientists and world leaders form the United Nations 24 Oct 1945 1946: Deceptive models of atomic and stellar cores betray lofty ideals of UN Charter 1948: Orwell writes a futuristic novel to warn of tyranny in “1984” from deception 1957: The USSR’s launch of Sputnik threatens immediate world tyranny 4 Oct 1957 1960: Richard M. Nixon’s narrow defeat delayed this march to tyranny 8 Nov 1960 1961: Eisenhower warns about the “scientific-technological elite” [11] 17 Jan 1961 1961: Kennedy announces USA will win the space race with Apollo on 25 May 1961 1962: Cuban missile crisis confirms the 1945 UN agreement is dead 15-28 Oct 1962 1963: John F. Kennedy assassination ends obstacle to nuclear détente 22 Nov 1963 1998: CSPAN video shows [10] NASA releasing data on the Sun’s core, 7 Jan 1998 2007: Czech President Vaclav Klaus [12] reports that tyranny now engulfs the planet 2009: Climategate emails and documents confirm global temperature manipulation
Conclusions from Hiroshima in Aug 1945 to Climategate in Nov 2009
Living inside the “sphere of influence” of the Sun’s pulsar core
Is like living in electron orbits around an atom’s nuclear core
We are humbly connected to RTG (Reality, Truth, God), or
We are arrogantly connected to false illusions of control !
THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS
Living in the benevolent stream of energy, all moral and religious teachings advised us to make the stream of life more benevolent downstream, as the great religious leaders, musicians, chefs, philosophers, scientists, humanists, and artists have all done! http://listverse.com/2011/02/19/top-10-greatest-philosophers-in-history/ http://listverse.com/2009/12/17/top-15-greatest-composers-of-all-time/
Scientists who are aware of their purpose in the stream of life will be compelled to pass along information that has been obtained by following basic principals of science, undistorted or compromised by their own human weaknesses.
The teachings of Lord Krishna, Buddha, Jesus, Prophet Muhammad and other religions; Beautiful music composed by Mozart, Bach, Beethoven, Wagner, Schubert and others; Gourmet meals famous chefs make from the best selection of vegetables and meats; Philosophical insight of Aristotle, Plato, Confucius, Avicenna and others; and even Thomas Jefferson’s writing of the US Declaration of Independence, . . . http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/
Proclaiming the rights of ordinary citizens to establish governments to protect human Life, Liberty and pursuit of Happiness – are all by-products of that energy stream! Climategate demonstrated that lofty ideals of the 1945 UN Charter – “to save humanity from the scourge of war and to reaffirm rights, dignity and worth of humans” cannot be accomplished by using deceptive science [7-10] to promote global fears [12]. Deception is now well-documented: Therefore, integrity cannot be restored to government science until constitutional limits are restored on government. Then AGW proponents and skeptics can join forces in “getting right sized“ and then restoring our deeply troubled society to its proper place in God’s beautiful bountiful universe: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10640850/Getting_Right_Sized_in_an_Infinite_Universe.pdf http://dingo.care2.com/cards/flash/5409/galaxy.swf
Working together we can achieve goals 1-6, instead of abandoning goals 5 and 6 for 1-4 !
1. We all want world peace.
2. An end to racism and nationalistic warfare.
3. An end to the threat of mutual nuclear annihilation.
4. Cooperative efforts to protect Earth’s environment and bounty.
5. Governments controlled by the people being governed, including.
6. Transparency and veracity (truth) of information given to the public.
However continued refusal by world leaders and by leaders of the Nobel Prize Committee, the UK’s Royal Society, the UN’s IPCC, the US NAS, the European AS and editors and the publisher of Nature, Science, PNAS, MNRS, BBC, PBS, etc., to work toward a “Win-Win Resolution” of the AGW debate will simply mean that Czech President – Professor Václav Klaus – correctly interpreted the motives for deception exposed by Climategate: Tyrannical control of the world [12].
THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO EXCEPTIONS
“What should we do?” asked one famous nuclear scientist.
“The beginning of the world may have been just like this,”
Responded another to the “nuclear fires” of Hiroshima.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Here is my good friend’s introductory video to
“Nellie the Neutron and Neutron Repulsion“
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6axqABexB4
This tells of angry Nellie’s abrupt escape from the compressed core of a Sun-like star:
Angry Nellie’s transformation from an invisible speck (less than a millionth of one billionth the size of an atom) into a contributing, light-emitting part of a beautiful, sparkling cosmos!
Neutron repulsion is the energy stored as rest mass (E = mc^2) in the cores of heavy atoms (A > 150 amu), fluid planets, ordinary stars and galaxies. Neutron repulsion, released on Hiroshima from cores of uranium atoms on 6 Aug 1945, scared world leaders into hiding information on this powerful source of energy, . . .
Obscuring critical information on the fountain of energy that Copernicus discovered in 1543 at the core of the solar system (Sol) sustaining our lives, making elements and exerting dominant control over the planets [2-4], especially the rocky ones closest to the Sun – Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars: http://tinyurl.com/7qx7zxs
Space age measurements [1-6] falsified information promoted on the source of energy in the cores of atoms and stars [7-10] after the United Nations was established on 24 Oct 1945 out of fear of the “nuclear fires” that consumed Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 Aug 1945 and 9 Aug 1945, respectively. World leaders reacted instinctively and started to provide research funds to test government approved models of Reality, rather than unbiased observations of Reality.
Reality, Truth, God, What Is, etc. are different names for that which is commonly perceived through experimentation, observation, meditation, contemplation, etc., all with these qualities: Benevolence, Omnipotence, Powerful, Unyielding.
Fear and Faith are opposing response to Reality, God, Truth, What Is, etc., that cannot coexist in mankind.
Post-1945 actions taken by world leaders out of fear of “nuclear fire” undermined the faith of our founding fathers in writing the US Declaration of Independence to establish this country on 4 July 1776: http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/
Recent NASA photographs [13] and videos [14] show mankind’s total dependence on Sol – the fountain of energy – and the Climategate fiasco demonstrated the foolishness of trying to hide our total dependence on the Sun, an object our antecessors worship [15].
References:
01. Peter Toth, “Is the Sun a pulsar?” Nature 270, 159-160 (1977) http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v270/n5633/abs/270159a0.html
02. Oliver K. Manuel and Alberto Boretti, “Yes, the Sun a pulsar,” Nature (submitted 12 Dec 2012) http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10640850/Yes_the_Sun_is_a_pulsar.pdf
03. Curt Suplee, “The Sun – Living with a stormy star,” National Geographic (July 2004) http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0407/feature1/index.html
04. “The sun’s origin, composition and source of energy,” in Lunar and Planetary Science XXIX, 1041, also available from Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX (CD-ROM, March 16-21, 2001) http://www.omatumr.com/lpsc.prn.pdf
05. Neutron repulsion video, “Scientific Genesis”: Neutron Repulsion (2001) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXNyLYSiPO0
06. Oliver K. Manuel, “Neutron repulsion,” The Apeiron Journal 19, 123-150 (2012) http://tinyurl.com/7t5ojrn
07. Hideki Yukawa, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (1946); Introduction to the Theory of Elementary Particles (1948) http://www.nndb.com/people/759/000099462
08. Fred Hoyle, “The chemical composition of the stars,” Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society 106, 255-59 (1946)
09. Fred Hoyle, “The synthesis of the elements from hydrogen,” Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society 106, 343-83 (1946)
10. Fred Hoyle, Home Is Where the Wind Blows [University Science Books, 1994, 441 pages], pages 153-154
11. Eisenhower’s farewell address and warning to the nation (17 Jan 1961) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOLld5PR4ts
12. Vaclav Klaus, Blue Planet in Green Shackles (Competitive Enterprise Institute, first edition, 2007) 100 pages, http://tinyurl.com/5z4j6g
13. Thirty NASA photographs of “Solar flares & Sun storms”
14. NASA video captures, “The surprising power of a solar storm”
15. Bing’s images of Sun worshippers: http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=sun+worshippers&qpvt=sun+worshippers&FORM=IGRE
For more information see my abbreviated profile: https://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
With kind regards,
Omanuel's Blog 
Hi Oliver
Nice little blog. “little” as of now, that is. 🙂
Best
S
Hi Oliver. Good to see you have a blog. I’ll add it to the list. 🙂
A writer at Power to the People clearly summarized the real problem this way:
“Fear of Humans – Pathology behind the Climate Change Movement”
The Awesome Sun (E = hv) and (E = mc^2) Makes the Climate Change, NOT CO2
“In a nutshell, the core ethos of the Climate Change Movement is the fear and loathing of humankind. Fear and loathing of the destructive nature of human’s who must be subjugated to prevent them from destroying the earth via using the forbidden knowledge of the Sun’s source of power, (E = hv) and (E = mc^2), neutron repulsion“ [1-3].
_ a.) The Sun was mostly iron until Aug 1945.
_ b.) Hiroshima was vaporized on 6 Aug 1945.
_ c.) Nagasaki was destroyed on 9 Aug 1945.
_ d.) The UN was established on 24 Oct 1945.
_ e.) The composition of the Sun’s interior was abruptly changed from iron (Fe) to hydrogen (H) and adopted unanimously, without debate or discussion in 1946: https://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2204
The best available post-1946 experimental data and observations from the nuclear and space ages show the core of the Sun is a pulsar fountain of energy [3-5] – the Creator, Destroyer and Sustainer of atoms, worlds and lives in the Solar System: https://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2339
References
1. E = hv : Max Planck, “Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum,” Annalen der Physik 309, issue 3, 553-563 (1901): http://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/annalen/history/historic-papers/1901_309_553-563.pdf
2. E = mc^2 : Albert Einstein, “Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig?”, Annalen der Physik 323, issue 13, 639-641 (1905): http://tinyurl.com/bh9sfpu
3. Neutron repulsion : Oliver K. Manuel, “Neutron Repulsion,” The APEIRON Journal 19, 123-150 (2012): http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V19NO2pdf/V19N2MAN.pdf
4. J. J. Jenkins, et al., “Additional experimental evidence for a solar influence on nuclear decay rates,” Astroparticle Physics 37, 81–88 (2012): http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927650512001442
5. Oliver K. Manuel and Alberto Boretti, “Yes, the Sun is a pulsar,” Nature (submitted 12 Dec 2012)
Click to access Yes_the_Sun_is_a_pulsar.pdf
Reblogged this on The GOLDEN RULE and commented:
Now THIS science and associated discourse I will accept and follow enthusiastically. The IPCC its components and followers can believe what they like and respond how they like, but if they
I constantly emailed this web site post page to all my
friends, for the reason that if like to read it then my friends will too.
Thank you for your comments
People all around the globe are awakening to the fact that binary thinking (either, or) has prevented recognition of the fact that leaders of Allied and Fascist nations, Communists and Capitalists, Democrats and Republicans all faced a harsh reality at the end of the Second World War:
Unite nations and take totalitarian control of the world or face possible death in a war of nuclear annihilation.
Not surprisingly, they agreed to cooperate to control the world. In 1946, George Orwell realized what had happened and tried to warn the public in his futuristic novel, “Nineteen Eighty-Four.”
http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984/
This recent video conveys the same message:
http://theinternetpost.net/2013/10/20/the-us-plantation-of-amerika/
Oliver,
I posted the following reply to you today at Real Science, at the page on Wisconsin temperatures (stevengoddard. wordpress. com/2013/07/28/wisconsin-obliterates-their-cold-records-for-the-date/). I haven’t heard from you yet, though I saw you posting later on another blog. I really would like to hear your answer, so I can know that I’ve everything I can to try to understand your research. Thank you.
Richard T. Fowler
============
My post from earlier today:
Oliver, I have a question for you, since I have thus far been unable to decode the answer from an inspection of your paper.
When you write about neutron repulsion power, you are clearly suggesting that there is a lot more energy available in the nucleus of (just for example) a uranium atom than is publicly acknowledged by government. (And I know there are issues of political collusion across national and ideological lines. For the moment I’d like to focus on the physical side of this matter.)
You have previously suggested (and presented some photos and eyewitness testimony in support of this) that the nuclear bombs dropped on Japan were observed to produced nuclear-energy-fed fires that would not extinguish for some extended period of time, and that the longevity and power of these fires was suppressed by government, thereby contributing to the condition wherein your nuclear-repulsion concept finds difficulty in gaining acceptance.
Given the above, then, my question for you is as follows. Is it your contention that what we know as conventional uranium fission reactors are not actually using fission to produce energy? Or, is it, rather, that they use fission in somewhat the way we’ve been told, but that the reaction is dampened in some way so as to produce less energy than is actually available, while remaining within the bounds said to be possible by prevailing physics?
Thank you.
Richard
Hi Richard,
Sorry for not responding earlier.
I just discovered my computer at home is not displaying most e-mail (google) messages I receive. Call me on my cell phone if I fail to answer a message: 573-647-1377
Only those who decided to deceive the public can explain the reason for their decision. I suspect it was driven by fear of nuclear annihilation and regret for having killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians.
I know these falsehoods became pseudo-scientific facts that misguided post-1945 science:
1. Stars fuse hydrogen in their cores to generate energy
2. Neutrons attract other neutrons in the cores of atoms
Please read carefully the following message sent to The Space Science & Technology Committee of the US House of Representatives on July 17/18/19, 2013
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Creator_Destroyer_Sustainer_of_Life.pdf
Make certain you understand these three sections:
p. 17: A nuclear “holocaust” was avoided; nationalism and racism were reduced as the result of official deception in 1945-46. So, who cares if:
o Neutrons repel, rather than attract, other neutrons
o Stars make and discard, rather than burn Hydrogen
o A pulsar is the Creator, Destroyer and Sustainer of Life ?
p. 4: The demise of modern science and society are the direct result of post-war policies based on Oppenheimer’s fears from Chapter 11, verse 32, rather than Kuroda’s hopes from the remainder of the Bhagavad-Gita’s description of the Creator, Destroyer and Preserver.
Kuroda was granted a special visa to enter the US for permanent residence after the war ended and continued research here on nuclear fission and element synthesis in the early solar system. In 1956 he reported that self-sustaining nuclear reactors burned on Earth and generated elements on Earth as recently as two billion years (~ 2 Gyr) ago. His calculations were correct, but fiercely opposed. They were limited to two, one-page reports in 1956 [2]. Fred Hoyle [3] and Hideki Yukawa [4] had already published the framework that would guide post-1945 physical sciences.
p. 10: But the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announced Nobel Prize awards in October 1983 for extensions of Hoyle’s 1946 papers [3]: Thus the scientific community escaped reality in 1983, as it had in 1977 when Science published a debate [14/14] and Nature published additional evidence [15] that the Sun birthed the solar system and then formed directly on the supernova core.
Hi Oliver,
Thank you very much for your two replies, here and at Real Science. I also apologize for my delay, but I’ve had other concerns occupying my attention since receiving your replies.
I assure I am exerting my maximum effort to understand your entire message of 17/18/19 July, including the sections you have highlighted.
May I ask you something about your other reply, at Real Science. You stated there:
Fission is the result of neutron repulsion in the cores of heavy atoms like U or Pu.
Fragmentation of stars and galaxies are probably powered by neutron repulsion.
Radioactive nuclear waste is a concentrated form of energy that should be used.
By your last sentence in that comment, do you mean to suggest that there is more fissile energy contained in a sample of U or Pu than is acknowledged by official physics? Because I think that in the case of spent U fuel rods, it is acknowledged that through further enrichment they can be run through a number of additional times, though I’m not sure if this is deemed to be always net-energy-positive. Is this the process that you were alluding to in your comment, or was it something else altogether?
I would also like to ask if your message to Congress is implying that all of what are called main-sequence stars are powered primarily through neutron repulsion and are therefore neutron stars? Or is it only certain of them for which this is the case? I ask because I’m trying to better understand your cosmology as it relates to the origin of stars. Again, thank you greatly for your consideration of my earlier question.
Richard
Hi Richard,
1. “do you mean to suggest that there is more fissile energy contained in a sample of U or Pu than is acknowledged by official physics?”
No. I suggest it is morally wrong to release energy from the cores of U or Pu and the to
_a.) Sell the energy that is easy and profitable to utilize, and to
_b.) Store the other energy as waste for the next generation to dispose.
2. “are all main-sequence stars powered primarily through neutron repulsion and therefore neutron stars?”
Probably. The Sun appears to be an ordinary star and we know from observations that it
_ a.) Has a pulsar core from the birth of the solar system
_ b.) Has an iron-rich mantle consisting mostly of Fe-56
_ c.) Makes and discards, rather than consumes, H
Sorry for the delay in responding.
– Oliver
PS – You may appreciate a website that describes the current state of university physics:
http://www.jefflindsay.com/PCPhysics.shtml
I appreciate your detailed reply. It definitely helps clear up some ambiguities that I’ve felt have persisted in your online postings and your recent public message.
If that link accurately describes the current state of university physics, then we all may be in a lot of trouble!
I’m going to take some time to study more before commenting extensively on your work, but I find some of your ideas interesting. With time they’ve seemed become more coherent. (Not that they were a disaster before, but you’ve tended to adopt a scattershot approach to disseminating them, and I think it causes a long delay before non-specialists are able to start to grasp what you’re getting at.)
And I’ve noticed that you’re beginning to disclose your uncertainties more clearly. I think that’s very important to building credibility with the general public.
One comment I think I do have to make now. Unlike yourself, I believe that all the stars formed at about the same time. That has implications when stellar observations are made, in that if stars are assumed to be of varying ages, that leads toward different models of their present structure than those that are allowed by the assumption of equal age. But generally, with my limited knowledge of physics it seems to me that your conclusions are compatible with either assumption.
Take care.
RTF
Reblogged this on Mothers Against Wind Turbines and commented:
This guy knows what he is talking about!
Climategate was the first public exposure of deception that was designed in 1945 to hide experimental evidence that neutron repulsion in cores of heavy atoms, stars and galaxies causes:
Fission, fragmentation, and neutron emission that becomes H-generation after n-decay.
To save the world from nuclear annihilation after 1945, two falsehoods were presented as standard, settled, 97%-consensus models of scientific facts:
1. Neutrons attract, rather than repel, other neutrons.
2. Stars consume, rather than generate, hydrogen.
Both statements are empirically FALSE, i.e., falsified by observations.
Global climate consensus is now crumbling, leaving behind the
False, standard models of nuclei and stars that destroyed the integrity of astronomy, astrophysics, climatology, cosmology, geology, nuclear, particle, planetary, solar and theoretical physics still remain in vogue today, as the consensus models of global climate change crumble.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Hi Professor Manuel,
I really don’t understand on the one hand your view that the world governments were overcome with fear about the destruction of the planet by nuclear fires. If that was the case, why did the Americans, British, Russians and French set off more than 2000 atomic bombs in the period between 1945 and 1963, when the ban on atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons were signed; except by the French who only signed the agreement in 1974/5?
I can remember reading about potential civilian uses of atomic bombs: creating a harbour in Alaska; building a new Hoover dam by detonating two bombs on either side of steep flanked valley; making oil wells more productive. The development of cleaner atomic bombs that gives off less radioactive waste, etc was the reason these civilian uses could be considered.
I thing that the effect of atomic bombs are vastly overstated, and that to use the word vaporise is misleading and a great exaggeration.
And on the other hand I read Prof Plimers tome and tend to agree with the iron cored sun theory. I fail to see how this is related to the deception of science since 1945.
I will reply in more detail later.
FEAR seems the most direct, simple explanation for a long list of puzzling actions after 1945, including
1. False claims that stars consume hydrogen, rather than generate it
2. False claims that neutrons attract, rather than repel, other neutrons
3. Efforts to hide evidence of self-sustaining nuclear reactors on Earth
4. Trying to hide evidence of nuclear reactors in cores of planets
5. Efforts to discredit evidence of cold fusion when first reported
6. Trying to hide Galileo’s finding of “strange xenon” in Jupiter.
Watch this 1998 CSPAN recording of NASA belatedly releasing 1995 data from the Galileo probe of Jupiter that confirmed predictions made in a 1983 paper [1] on the Sun’s iron rich interior:
[1] “Solar abundances of the elements”, Meteoritics 18, 209-222 (1983):
http://tinyurl.com/224kz4
Professor Manual, Thank you for taking the time to reply to me.
From everything I have read, keeping in mind that the narrative of the events change with each new generation, the parties involved in the WWII conflict were just plain war-weary. Russia, who bore the brunt of burden in the fight against the Nazies lost close on 20 million person, 1 in 5 of their population. And because the Americans had to fight a war on two fronts, Europe and the Pacific, there was a growing realisation that they could not hide behind the Atlantic and Pacific walls of isolation, falling back on the Monroe doctrine of no involvement in world affairs. It was self-preservation, and an uncommon outbreak of common sense, that infused the political leaders of the day to form and sign-up to the \United Nations. They had the best of intentions to avoid the mindless slaughter of their young on battlefields, an event which took place twice in the lives of the older folk.
It is understandable that most Japanese would be overwhelmed and awestruck by the effects of the two bombs that were dropped, however the firestorms in some German cities,(Dresden by the USA and Hamburg by the RAF) earlier was just as devastating with a comparable loss of life. And let us not forget that the in the UK 1 in 15 houses were completely destroyed by the German bombing raids and 1 in 5 suffered some damage during the same conflict. Britain, Germany, France, Russia, China, Japan and a host of other countries suffered severe material losses coupled with numerous casualties: the, dead and the maimed.. It was only right and correct that the political leaders of the day signed-up to something to stop it from happening again.
Paste this link in your browser, close the gap to see Al Gore and the UN’s IPCC :
http://www.you tube.com/watch?v=m3VIFmZpFco
“Why did the Americans, British, Russians and French set off more than 2000 atomic bombs in the period between 1945 and 1963?”
Excellent question!
Why? Did these four nations have anything in common after being made permanent members of the United Nations Security on 24 October 1945?
Why were leaders of other nations invited to view 2000 powerful nuclear explosions, accompanied by their military leaders? Was there a message for them?
Was it Submit to the UN or be destroyed?
Al Gore is doing very well pedalling doomsday scenarios, he is smarter and richer than both of us, good luck to him.
But, quoting Al Gore cannot be used in any honest discussion about science, if you persist in using the American equivalent of court jesters I’ll use any of the Hollywood pea brains.
I think that the effect of atomic bombs are vastly overstated, and that to use the word vaporise is misleading and a great exaggeration.
I was not trying to exaggerate. Instant vaporization occurred in some cases.
Professor Manuel,
I think it was Napoleon who said something to the effect:
Do not read malice or conspiracy where sheer plain stupidity is to blame .
I saw that one of the big arguments against the book of Prof Ian Plimer was the fact that he subscribed to the misleading iron-cored sun theory. When I read it set off alarm bells, as they were protesting too much.
And I personally think the climategate event has just showed that the so-called climate scientists are big liars, and too to bright, to whit; the esteemed Professor Jones lamented in one email that he hasn’t got a clue how to fire-up and run an Excel spreadsheet! Sounds more like the Three Stooges than anything else.
Lastly, I do know that you pointed out that there are some particles missing in the solar wind, and that only an iron-cored sun can explain the deficit. Surely, in time, the truth will win, hopefully, in your lifetime. These new satellites are showing more detail than anyone could imagine.
Chapter 1 of my autobiography has finally been completed and is available here:
Click to access Chapter_1.pdf
A one page synopsis is available here:
Click to access Synopsis.pdf
This information is being posted as written with the conclusions first because frankly I do not know if I will be around to write or you around to read information that our government still wants to hide.
That information is in red type and highlighted in yellow on both documents.
Hello again, Oliver!
A recap follows of our conversation the last two days at my blog. I call your attention to my reply at the bottom, in which I have a couple of questions for you.
RTF
========================================================================
omanuel 2014/10/15 22:53 at 22:53 Edit
Richard,
The Hungarian astronomer, Peter Toth, reported the Sun’s regular pulse in Nature in 1977 – just like a pulsar.
That same year Science reported our debate with University of Chicago scientists over a false claim superheavy element fission made “strange xenon” that we reported to be from local element synthesis in 1975, after first reporting the “strange xenon” as supernova debris in Nature in 1972.
The USSR controlled Hungary in 1977. I was unable to contact Peter Toth after his 1977 paper was published in Nature.
I do not know if foul play was involved, but it seemed strange to me that a major discovery preceded his disappearance.
These are only small parts of the sixty-four year history of government deceit before Climategate emails finally revealed purposeful fraud in Nov 2009.
Here’s more of the story:
========================================================================
========================================================================
Richard T. Fowler 2014/10/16 09:52 at 09:52 Edit
Thanks; can you explain in simple layman’s terms how it affects the fields of chemical engineering and/or nuclear power reactors if the Sun is a pulsar? In other words, what specifically would be the motive for silencing an astronomer who wanted the world to know that the Sun is a pulsar? Thank you.
RTF
========================================================================
Richard,
World leaders could not admit a pulsar might power the Sun without being forced to admit that neutron repulsion is the source of energy in the core of the Sun – the same source of energy that causes cores of heavy atoms to fission in atomic bombs and nuclear reactors.
Hey Oliver ,
I just saw your comments in response to mine about political action . You posted three comments in succession , starting here :
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/05/01/ncdc-blocks-access-to-ghcn-data/#comment-519773
I posted a reply at my blog to your request for me to expand on this . I’m sure you probably saw it .
Your interest was very helpful . I plan to do a post on this later today or tomorrow , with some more ideas along these lines .
Before I did that , I wanted to just respond here to a couple of points you made .
You wrote ,
Political correctness is a problem in most churches today , though they certainly are not the only groups to fall for that Leftist trap .
But I have to say that I don’t think the Christian community as a whole has a lot of resilience against that trap , because the Scriptures do contain warnings about it , and people do pick up on those warnings . I’ve been to some powerful Christian-led political demonstrations that were absolutely on fire with the Spirit of God and had strong turnouts , within the last 10 years . But they were not related to the climate or energy hoaxes . I think the greatest problem in spurring the Church to action is not an addiction to political correctness but simply that most Christians still do not understand the enormous import of the issue , nor do they seem to understand that the political leaders whom they are supporting have no current intention to do anything to put a stop to the fraud . Thus they don’t perceive the need for a large and well-organized movement . Left to their own devices , they probably will not perceive such a need until it is far too late for it to make a meaningful difference . They have the power of numbers , and they have the experience with organizing campaigns . But they don’t yet feel motivated to organize around this particular issue . That may change within the next 8-12 months . Stay tuned .
You also wrote ,
I would argue that science is already naturally merged with spirituality , and that it could never be otherwise . Science means “knowledge” or the application of it . Knowledge can be wrong or it can be right . Fundamentally it just means something that we’re certain of , whether in fact we’re right or not . This is similar to Christian belief , which in reading the gospels one ultimately finds does not mean a partial or uncertain belief or faith , but the absolute knowledge based on experience . This is the original definition of science , and unfortunately there has been a huge amount of revision in the philosophy of professional science since it was first articulated . The original “scientia” was not naturalist in the sense of rejecting the supernatural as a real thing and a legitimate topic for systematic study . In fact , even since “science” nominally adopted a naturalistic orientation , it has continued in practice (i.e. de facto) to tolerate non-naturalist interpretations , both good ones and bad ones , mostly bad . The greatest problem I see with this is that they mostly will not admit , which makes them a group of severe liars and hypocrites . Science itself has always been political . The Atheists and Agnostics will claim that “allowing religion into science” , as they put it , it to allow politics to get its nose under the tent , and a fatal error . Theists know that this is nonsense , but debating the question with them seems pointless because they always the change the subject , and it seems they will almost always lie about their own beliefs and also about the subjective nature of those beliefs .
The solution then is to avoid unnecessary confrontation about this matter , and practice science to the best of our ability in concert with those who share our philosophy of the art .
— RT
“Now there are diversities of administrations , but the same Lord . And there are diversities of operation , but it is the same God who works all in all . But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal . For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom ; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit ; to another faith by the same Spirit ; to another the working of miracles ; to another prophecy ; to another discerning of spirits ; to another diverse kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues : but all these work that one and the selfsame Spirit , dividing to every man severally as he will .
“For as the body is one , and has many members , and all the members of that one body , being many , are one body : so also is Christ . For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body , whether we be Jews or Gentiles , whether bond or free ; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit . For the body is not one member , but many .”
— I Corinthians 12:5-14
Sorry , I wrote “I don’t think the Christian community as a whole” , and that should have read “I think the Christian community as a whole” . Perhaps you could correct it for me . Thanks .
RT
I will try to make the correction for you when I get to my computer.
Greetings Oliver ,
I thought you might want to see this . — RT
https://richardtfowler.wordpress.com/2015/05/19/theres-more-to-being-a-climate-realist-than-speeding-up-drilling/
I am really getting fed up with your off topic postings on all climate blogs in the world, please reply on topic.
Thanks for the information. I am more concerned that the internet will be closed down to prevent the public from knowing about Stalin’s science and the corruption of science after WWII:
I’m not that good in mathematics so could you please tell me if this makes sense .
Thanks for the comment. I will listen to the video and reply. I have respect for Steven.
great talk
@Oliver; A few days ago I was examining possibilities on how the original hydrogen could create the first stars and get the ball rolling in the fabrication of elements. It occurred to me that as the Hydrogen gas nebula coalesced into a point that would “ignite” it would explode as in a Hydrogen bomb, blowing the gas and debris away. So a starting star would flash and darken. Later flash and darken. the timing of the flashes would shorten as the local density increased and heavier elements created could settle into a core. Atomic Hydrogen tendency to twin into H-H along with packing pressures from its’ neighbors would encourage some to convert to Neutron and Deuterium. D becomes H-D, later H-T. If energy, mater density becomes unfavorable, reversion to hydrogen and liberated Neutrons, chain reaction, blow off. After time repeat.
An all Hydrogen Star can not exist as it will blow up. Heavier and more stable elements must be present to stabilize the reaction by providing the energy inertia and gravity needed to slow and stabilize the reactions. A large Iron Core is necessary for a stable star. Too much free hydrogen makes it unstable…pg
Yes, there are no hydrogen-filled stars. Fred Hoyle proposed that crazy idea in 1946, but Willy Fowler received the Nobel Prize for Fred Hoyle’s idea in 1983. In 1994, Fred Hoyle himself exposed on pages 153-154 of his autobiography how the internal composition of the Sun was arbitrarily changed from:
_ a.) Mostly iron (Fe) in 1945 to
_ b.) Mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946
without any public discussion or debate. See: Fred Hoyle, Home Is Where the Wind Blows: Chapters from a Cosmologist’s Life (1994)
So what about Jupiter. They tell us it has more or less the same composition as the Sun.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter
The composition of Jupiter is unlike that of the Sun.
Jupiter contains “strange xenon” (Xe-2), like that observed with primordial helium in diamond inclusions of carbonaceous meteorites.
Jupiter: http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1998Data.htm
Meteorites: http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1975Data.htm
Jupiter came from the outer layers of the supernova that birthed the solar system. Jupiter consists mostly of light elements, H, He, C, N plus an excess of actinide elements made by the r-process. That is probably the source of excess heat in Jupiter.
@Robertv; Good catch. If Jupiter were larger, 10 times, it should heat enough to blow it’s cover, hydrogen/Helium and “glow” in the dark. A new star. Cosmology needs to be reworked, Astro-physics and nuclear-physics both need rewriting. The theory does not match the facts. Kind of like the “science” involved in the study of climate change…pg
@oliver; Good News! It appears that our/your efforts may have had an effect. At least 100 people from all over the world have examined the post:
This week A group of moderate Muslims nailed a manifesto on the door of the main mosque in New York, ah-la Martin Luther. Demanding reformation of Muslim Dogma and an end of Demands for Sharia. We shall see if Europe will grasp this start. It appears moderates have tasted Americanism and are feeling safe enough to call for an end to political Islam, as well as an end to conversion by conquest. I would guess that some of the followers of this religion of “peace” would actually want that to be a fact.
Muslim prophecy for the near time is that their world would be swept away. The 12th Imam that is now hidden would appear to lead them and he would walk with Jesus. Above all Jesus walked the path of, “Peace toward others.”